Wednesday 30 July 2014

Tell no one - Back to the Secret Cinema botch-up and how it will impact its ongoing reputation

The lack of a clear explanation from the Secret Cinema organisers is hugely frustrating and slightly worrying in terms of their claims that the Back to the Future show is still going to go ahead today, so we shall just have to see, but at least they are staying true to the inherent philosophy of Secret Cinema - tell no one.

Last week Secret Cinema was set to open its latest offering - an immersive cinema experience based around Back to the Future... and then they cancelled it and then they cancelled it again; both times without providing a clear explanation. 

After a week's delay the show is set to launch today, but with many of the patrons left refunded and disgruntled, how will this setback impact Secret Cinema's ongoing reputation?


There is no question that the organisation of the Secret Cinema events are a logistical nightmare and a delay such as the current Back to the Future one was always going to happen at some point. 


"We are extremely sorry for the delayed communications of the last week. We know we let our audience down and will do everything we can to make it up to them." 
- Fabien Riggall, founder of Secret Cinema


The lack of a clear explanation from the Secret Cinema organisers is hugely frustrating and slightly worrying in terms of their claims that the Back to the Future show is still going to go ahead today, so we shall just have to see, but at least they are staying true to the inherent philosophy of Secret Cinema - tell no one.


Tell no one - they got that right!




In a sense, the fact that this happened with Back to the Future is a blessing, because it's part one of a trilogy, so if the organisers really wanted to redeem their reputation and build on what they have done this year, then it might in their interests to offer the full trilogy as a show in the near future and give all the patrons who fell by the wayside priority booking at a reduced rate next time around.


I was tempted, Back to the Future is one of my all time favourite films.






Secret Cinema and its public awareness has been steadily climbing over the last 10 years and, in addition to the Back to the Future show promising to be their biggest offering to date, the public awareness of it has completely eclipsed the coverage of the previous shows and especially so now that it has suffered this huge setback!

The type of highly immersive pubic exhibition experience Secret Cinema offers is still very much in its infancy, so hiccups are to be expected. This fiasco has identified a major public relations flaw in the overall Secret Cinema operation that, unlike with their previous minor slip-ups, they are really going to need to address this time around, once they (hopefully) get Back to the Future running.







Fortunately there is a growing taste for a public film experience superior to what the cineplexes are currently offering; by its very existence, this is something of which Secret Cinema is more than aware. Secret cinema has public demand on their side; a public that is now demanding them to sort their act out and Secret Cinema will go on to do just that.


London's very own Hill Valley bringing you right into the film.



The spectators active participation is an integral component of the experience that Secret Cinema offers; if Secret Cinema did not think or value this, then we would not have Secret Cinema, we would just have another cineplex offering.

The cancellations are unfortunate for all the patrons who have been brushed off, but this will no doubt improve Secret Cinema's public relations from here on out and increase the future public awareness of the tantalising experience it has to offer... when it goes to plan.

Ultimately, one thing is for sure: Secret Cinema is not a secret any more.

Friday 25 July 2014

The Miracle of Crowdfunding: UPDATE 8 - I've made some changes to the video package (26/07/2014)


Okay, while I have had a few new ideas that will alter what I wrote in the last update, the filming next week will be largely unaltered.

First off



SOUND

I think I know what is wrong with the sound, because we're still getting a slight disturbance.

It's nothing that I can't shift, but it'll be easier if I do not have to to deal with it in future.

The problem is either:

the sound recording box itself

or 

the little wire that connects the box to the SLR

Next time we're in Uni, we'll have a play around.



Monday. University of Bath - The Dream of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

I have found the music I am going to use and this should really give an idea for the tone of the whole thing...



At some point, we need to get an establishing shot of the sham Castle from over the other side of the city, because I am going to start the video with me saying:

"On a hill overlooking the city of Bath, there is a Sham castle..."

Establishing shot of the castle with a gentle zoom.

Fade to:

Me walking up hill towards sham castle.

Fade to:

Me looking up at sham castle.

Cut to:

Me sat down on bench telling the rest of the story. 


Filming list for Monday

  • Shot of the University of Bath sign by bus stop.
  • Me sat on bench telling the full story.
  • Cutaways of immediate area surrounding bench.
  • Field inbetween Uni and Sham castle - capture shouting audio for the money shot in the main film and some other outside audio I need as voiceover.
  • Footage of sham castle.
  • Footage of me looking up at Sham Castle
  • Shot of me walking up hill towards sham castle
  • Establishing shot of sham castle
  • Buying the pint with £5 note.
  • Maybe grabs some of the spontaneous inbetween points I mentioned in the last post, we'll see.
WE NEED TO GRAB SOME PHOTOS AS WELL.


I will aim to get up between 12 and 1 and then I will come to yours like I did last time.



Thursday. Bristol, my house and University of Bristol

Come over early and we'll blitz our way through everything I need for:


  • the teaser
  • the main film
  • Grab some of the material for A Day in the Life of the Box, I have been re-thinking this video, see below.
  • Grab voice-over material in my room as well, as it sounds REALLY good when done in here. 

Then we'll head over to Park Street/University of Bath and grab:


  • shot of me sat down and talking into camera
  • cutaways of the surrounding area.

I am going to head up there either Tuesday or Wednesday and figure it out in advance; in fact, I will probably pop up there tomorrow before work. 

I really want to get The Research of the Miracle of Crowdfunding knocked on the head next week. I also want to get all of the teaser and main film stuff done. 


The Teaser of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

If I have everything I need for the teaser, then I can finish it and use it to launch the website, which I can use to build anticipation and interest for the launch of the main campaign.



Re-thinking the video marketing package, slightly

Okay, so I have slightly re-thought the thematic focus of each video and this is reflected within how I have retitled some of the videos...


  • MiracleMasters.Me - The Teaser of the Miracle of Crowdfunding


  • The Miracle of Crowdfunding - A Masters Campaign Film

  • Crowdfunding Potential - The Example of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

  • Crowdfunding outside the Box - The Research of the Miracle of Crowdfunding
  • Crowdfunding Success - The Masterplan of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

  • Crowdfunding Failure - The Longevity of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

  • Crowdfunding inside the Box - The Reality of the Miracle of Crowdfunding (previously, A Day in the Life of the Box)

  • Crowdfunding Journey - The Dream of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

  • Making a Masters Campaign Package - The Making of the Miracle of Crowdfunding, Part 1

  • I've made some changes - The Metamorphosis of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

  • Let's do it again - The Bloopers of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

  • Re-making a Masters Campaign Film - The Making of the Miracle of Crowdfunding, Part 2

  • The Miracle Realised! The Conclusion of the Miracle of Crowdfunding



The two major changes occur within: 

Crowdfunding Failure: The Longevity of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

and 

Crowdfunding inside the Box: The Reality of the Miracle of Crowdfunding



Crowdfunding Failure: The Longevity of the Miracle of Crowdfudning

How is your bike?

Alternatively, do you have a bike you can borrow?

This video I was originally going to film in my room...

... and then I figured out a way to visualise it.

Every video deals with its own theme, therefore while, Crowdfunding Revealed: The Research of the Miracle of Crwodfunding is about the research I did to understand what crowdfunding is and how it can be utilised, it is equally about stepping out of your comfort zone - like how I moved to Bristol to step out of my comfort zone.

Therefore, we film it in an iconic and central location of Bristol that also happens to house the University of Bristol - an institution renowned for it's research. 

The problem with filming Crowdfunding Failure: The Longevity of the Miracle of Crowdfunding in my room is it does not really properly visualise the theme and message of the video, which in this case is to not allow a failure to stop you - to see the negative in the positive - a failure is just a reminder, a point where you stop and review your situation, but the journey goes on after that.

Therefore, we film on a location that I occupy on a regualr basis and that perfectly visualizes the theme.

On the Bristol to Bath cycle, there is a pit stop not far outside Bath.

Therefore, we film:


  • Me sat down talking my thing
  • footage of me fixing the chain on my bike
  • various cutaways
  • shot of me cycling away down the path back to the Bristol
You see where I am going with this, the journey goes on, so to speak...



Crowdfunding in the Box: The Reality of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

Previously, The Day in the Life of the Box

We are missing a trick with this one and you are right, this one needs to have a comedic tone to it, it makes sense when you look at the tone of the other videos, the 4 videos preceding this one are all quite serious, so this one needs to have a lighter tone. 

What I've already shot.

I have not fully figured how to do this one yet, which is why I am not worrying too much about filming too much material for it.

In addition to each video revealing more information about my masters and the overall project, they also reveal a bit more about myself and my philosophy. 

With this video, we have a real opportunity to demonstrate my habit of making my mind up about something... and then completely changing my mind 2 minutes later.

Therefore, present my daily routine as I have already laid it down and juxtapose that with the absolute chaotic routine of assembling this campaign package that pretty contradicts my established routine.

The one that I laid down in what I have already recorded was my daily routine before I started this project, since starting this project it it has been much more about improvising from day-to-day, so the video can be a presentation of my daily routine constantly contradicting itself.

Through the course of doing so the video will visually present something that I have been saying for over a year now...

It's about becoming comfortable with being uncomfortable.

Therefore, 

if Crowdfunding outside the Box - The Research of the Miracle of Crowdfunding is about pushing yourself outside of your comfort zone, 

then 

Crowdfunding inside the Box - The Reality of the Miracle of Crowdfunding is about staying outside of that comfort zone and becoming proficient at working on the fly - becoming comfortable at being uncomfortable. It's about finding a new uncomforatble comfort zone.

Chaotically comedic while still presently the fact of my situation is what this video needs to be.

One idea I just came up with is to do it back-to-front and side-to-side and by this I mean present my classic daily routine alongside the routine of building this crowdfunding campaign, I am currently working through the night to reset my sleeping pattern for the weekend, so when I do it again next friday film myself getting up in the afternoon working through the evening, early hours editing, working on website, talking to camera, cut in footage from when we were shooting the other stuff and corss-cut all of this with footage of my classic routine, but have night me point out how all of that has gone to shit because of this project, but how I am not fighting that and have just embraced it and getting the absolute best from it. 

I don't really fancy doing it tonight, as I am currently feeling a little under the weather - it's this constant heat exhaustion, it has fucked my immune system.

However, I will have a think about it while I am folding t-shirts.

I will also pop over to Park Street tomorrow and do a bit of figuring out for The Research video, maybe see if there is a way to make that one slightly comedic too, seeing how it is the twin of The Reality video.


Tuesday 22 July 2014

The Miracle of Crowdfunding: UPDATE 7 - Lower Weir, University of Bath, the bits inbetween, the importance of water and the best part (23/07/2014)


Okay, unsurprisingly there have been quite a few changes since last we spoke, but they are all improvements for the overall project.


Crowdfunding platform change

I am no longer funding the project through StudentFunder, reasoning:

  • It doesn't look like they can meet my August 20th start date
  • Their user interface is a bit too restrictive
  • I have not had a chance to finish my official application form
I then decided to switch to 

GoFundMe 

which is the platform that I was going to use to fund my second year, as this platform affords you much more freedom. 

However, I have also decided to abandon that idea.

Finally, I have settled on using 

indiegogo

which is basically the number 2 crowdfunding platform after Kickstarter.

I have switched to indiegogo because:


  • It has quite a dynamic user and campaign page interface and offers more options in terms of what you can do with it in regards to other content that you have online, which is going to be a lot with the Miracle of Crowdfunding.
  • Flexible funding - even if you do not reach your overall goal, you can keep what you do make n the time span of your project (minus the 9% indiegogo deducts for their fee). But this project WILL reach its goal; hell will freeze over before I allow that not to happen.
  • There is no application or approval process. I complete my profile and then it go live - to hell with application forms!
  • It aligns with my philosophy of being a bit of an anti-academic/academic rebel. StudentFunder is a bit too cosy in that respect. The success of this project depends on the image it projects and the message that image conveys - mine is doing my own thing.
  • Basically, I can do a lot more with indiegogo - I get the best of all worlds!

The project IS going to launch on August 20th - that is an immoveable and essential date. For once I am going to have to meet my deadline.

Plus, this whole change process and the thinking I put into it can be its own little post on The Miracle of Crowdfunding blog.

You see, every negative has its positive and with me every positive has another positive and another positive and another positive...

Pessimism be damned!

That will make a nice title for another blog posts - I am on fire!




Masters Campaign Film Mirco Pitch

I have now scripted a micro campaign pitch that will take place within and form a cohesive part of the film's opening montage.

In addition to teasing the rest of the video, the first minute will pitch the entirety of the Miracle of Crowdfunding project, so if people do not wish to watch the whole thing, then they do not have to, but to ensure they watch the first minute at least (and then stay to watch the entirety of it), the videos static image will be something along the lines of the following:

We'll shoot it in my room with me talking into from same angle as the final shot in the script, so that the film has an overal bookendedness to it. 





 

Video campaign package - update 

In addition to their being 30 micro sting videos for each day, there will also be thirteen major videos released over the course of those 30 days and released in the following order:
  1. Miracle Masters Me - The Teaser of the Miracle of Crowdfuding [this will be released prior to the 20th August start of te campaign].
  2. The Miracle of Crowdfunding - A Masters Campaign Film [this will be released on day 1].
  3. Crowdfunding Potential - The Example of the Miracle of Crowdfunding 
  4. Crowdfudning Revealed - The Research of the Miracle of Crowdfunding 
  5. Crowdfunding Goal - The Masterplan of the Miracle of Crowdfunding 
  6. Crowdfunding Failure - The Longevity of the Miracle of Crowdfunding
  7. A Day in the Life of the Box - The Reality of the Miracle of Crowdfunding 
  8. Crowdfunding Aspirations - The Dream of the Miracle of Crowdfunding [CRUCIALLY, this will be released on day 20]
  9. Making a Masters Campaign Package - The Making of the Miracle of Crowdfunding, Part 1 
  10. Let's do it again - the Bloopers of the Miracle of Crowdfunding 
  11. I've made some changes - the Alternatives of the Miracle of Crowdfunding 
  12. Re-making a Masters Campaign Film - The Making of the Miracle of Crowdfunding, Part 2
  13. The Miracle Realised - The Conclusion of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

Most of these are the same from the last time I laid them out.


The only differences are:
  • Replacing Crowdfunding Incentives - The Perks of the Miracle of Crowdfunding with Crowdfunding Failure - The Longevity of the Miracle of Crowdfunding.  
    • Each of the campaign perks will be outlined on the indiegogo campaign page and with each have their own page of the MiracleMaster.me Miracle of Crowdfunding website. There will also be a blog post in which I will discuss the thinking behind them, BUT I may yet do it as a video, as I was going to shoot it on my own in my room anyway, so we'll see.  
    • Crowdfunding Failure - The Longevity of the Miracle of Crowdfunding is just a video of me in my room talking about the longevity and usefulness of this overall project, even if it is a failure, it's not going to be, but the longevity of online projects (the reason why I put the entirety of EYES online) is worth considering. I will also shoot The Miracle Unrealised material (for the conclusion video) with this, as it will put me in the right frame of mind to do so.
  • A Day in the Life of the Box - The Reality of the Miracle of Crowdfunding. This is exactly what it says on the tin - a video that outlines an average work hard day in my box room. The spine of which I shot today, here is one of the takes:

This video is actually 11:00, but it appears to only have uploaded 06:00. 

Anyway have a watch as we are going to need to shoot some cutaway material illustrating what I talk here when you go over to shoot the rest of the other primary film and teaser and conclusion material. I ahve already complied a list of some of the shots I need for this (some of which I can get on my own), but others I will need assistance, but have a watch and see if you have any ideas.

  • Crowdfunding Aspirations - The Dream of the Miracle of Crowdfunding. This one - the one we are going to shoot up at the University of Bath - is going to be released on Day 20, because unlike the videos that preceeded it, this is one is going to be very emotion-centric and deal directly with the primary motivation and need behind the Miracle of Crowdfunding. 
    • The last 10 days of any crowdfunding project are ALWAYS when the majority of the funds roll in, so we need to provide a strong incentive for that to happen - you have to think about the last 10 days of the final act of a film.
    • The tone of this one is going to be closer to that of the first primary campaign. If the videos inbetween are more factual videos essays, this one is more of a documentary story.
    • It is a character study that is going to tie into the story and thinking behind EYES, which is why the filming tomorrow at the Weir is so incredibly crucial...


Bath Lower Weir - Making a Master Campaign Package - The Making of the Miracle of Crowdfunding, Part 1

First up, if you have not already done so, watch the following two videos...





We are going to need to recreate some of the weir shots tomorrow, firstly because of the

We are going to shoot Making a Masters Campaign first, so that I can visually tie it into the EYES footage I am going to cut in and use the EYES web series concept proposal package as a whole to explain how it was the model for the Miracle of Crowdfunding package and to explain how the overall thing came together

We'll do it a bit like the location vlog video above.

Basically, I don't know, so we'll have a play around tomorrow - shoot enough of me explaining the thinking, the making and the evolution of the overall Miracle package and then get loads of cutaways to use as well. 


Bath Lower Weir - The importance of water & The Dream of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

I had an ephiphany this afternoon which is why I changed my mind about shooting in Bristol tomorrow.

The point of the The Dream of the Miracle of Crowdfunding is it exposes the driving force behind everything and I was thinking about how I could start it and then I thought I could describe the anxiety I had all the way through my final year - that was also a recurrent nightmare:

I was on a ship sailing across the ocean, eveything was going great... and then I fell of the edge of the world 

a.k.a. I was burning through my final year, excelling at everything... and then I graduated.

I thought - that's great, how the hell would I show that visually...

... and then it occurred to me, I had already done it in my final year. I need some form of moving water with a votex waterfall iconongraphy - the weir! I had already visualised that anxiety in EYES and as I always described EYES "EYES is a story about the subtext" - my subtext.

Anyhow, all of the ideas I have will take too long to explain here, but surfice to say everything is connected and the footage we get at Weir is crucial!


University of Bath filming -  The Dream of the Miracle of Crowdfunding

Okay, we need to grab the following:


  • Shots of the Sham Castle and shots of me staring up at the sha castle - this is a 5 minute walk from the uni
  • There is a field in between which will be perfect to grab the dialogue for the money shot in the Masters Campaign Film.
  • A shot of me sat on the bench on the university campus telling the story and supplying the spine of the video
  • Many cutaway shots of the immediate area around the bench and anything else we think will be of use in illustrating and bring visual meaning to what I say.

The bits inbetween

I have been watching through The Example and The Masterplan videos we have already shot and have made notes of the points I forget to say.

Therefore, instead of reshooting each interview, we shoot micro clips of me saying each of the points I missed, like they are passing remarks/behind-the-scene esque stuff and I will cut them in later.

We see what we can get tomorrow and the rest I can always do in my room.

Simple.


The best part

I am going to buy you a pint tomorrow!

I have been rejigging the Masters Campaign Film in the edit and I have thought of a way to really hammer hone the point of anyone being able to spare £5, not long after I say that in the film when I say:

"Potential empowering potential."

cut in:

shot of me handing £5 to bar person

cut to:

Bar person giving me a pint, me turning towards camera and holding the pint up to camera.

cut to:

shot of you holding fig rig with DSLR, bring the pint into shot and showing a gesture of cheers

Sheer poetry.


Finally

Put the batteries on charge.

Get a good nights sleep

And I will see you bright and early tomorrow morning.

I will ring you when I get into Bath, so keep yor phone on and close by!

And I going to make some more lists now, so that I know what to say tomorrow...










Monday 21 July 2014

The Two Hearts of Harold Lloyd's Girl Shy - A Critical Film Review


In many ways the sheer ambition and scale of what Lloyd does with Girl Shy’s race sequence tops what he did with the building climb in Safety Last, albeit horizontally.

Harold Lloyd! If you have not heard of him or have only vaguely heard of him, then you need to keep reading this! 


Unlike Charlie Chaplin or Laurel & Hardy (I am currently looking into Buster Keaton), I was not a huge fan of Harold Lloyd until, until I had the privilege to research his life and films for a research portfolio I had to assemble for the Understanding Hollywood module I undertook in the penultimate year of my BA (Hons). 

The research and writing was undertaken between November 2011 and February 2012 and I continued to explore his work even after the portfolio was completed. This critical essay forms one component of that portfolio - a portfolio that was awarded a first.

What follows is what I originally wrote in the submitted critical review, more or less. I hope you enjoy discovering the deeper complexity and tenderness of that most famous skyscraper dangling silent comedian - Harold Lloyd.

“The image of Harold Lloyd dangling from a clock attached to the face of a skyscraper is by general agreement the most famous shot of American silent comedy” (Steven Jacobs 2010:152). 

Lloyd hangs out in Safety Last“To his chagrin, Harold Lloyd was labelled as a stunt comedian; the picture of him hanging from a clock seems to be all that people remember” (Brownlow 1979:144).


This iconic image comes from Lloyd’s most recognised film Safety Last (Dir. Fred C. Newmeyer and Sam Taylor, USA, 1923); as Paul Merton comments: “In Safety Last Harold Lloyd climbs to the top of his profession” (Merton 2007:182). Certainly, if you are talking about Lloyd finding his own niche in the silent comedy genre and in creating an iconic image then, yes, Lloyd does climb to the top of his profession. 

However, if are talking about Lloyd’s diversity as an actor then Safety Last really doesn’t hit the mark, not by a long shot:

“He was an outstanding actor – his facial expressions were so subtle that you sometimes thought that, like Keaton, they never changed. And yet they could convulse you all by themselves” (Brownlow 1979:144).

Beneath this initial comic façade there is a far greater actor and, in quite a few of his films, this performer gets to stretch his acting muscles - especially so in Girl Shy (Dir. Fred C. Newmeyer and Sam Taylor, USA, 1924).



In Girl Shy Lloyd plays a character named Harold Meadows: a tailor apprentice to his uncle (Richard Daniels), Harold suffers from a severe stutter that is induced by a fear of woman. 

To combat this Harold works on a book “The Secret of Making Love,” in which he writes about various fictional love affairs he claims to have had. 


One of the fictional episodes from "The Secret of Making Love".

We see two of these nonsensical episodes illustrated with two stereotypical women of the 1920s: the Vamp, who he wins her over by ignoring her, and the Slapper, who he wins over by throwing against a wall. 

The episodes are clear indicators of his lack of knowledge of women and for which he is later mocked: “I suppose you can look right into the depths of a woman’s soul.”

While this is indicative of a lack of knowledge it is not a lack of respect, and this is one of the film's biggest strengths. By: “putting them on pedestals and worshiping them” (Everson 1978:271), Lloyd was one of the comics who actively embraced and promoted women. Therefore, his shyness of woman is just an indicator of his respect of viewing a woman as something so special she is unattainable. 

From when I originally wrote this critical review in 2012.


This changes when Harold becomes entwined with Jobyna Ralston’s character Mary Buckingham. After Mary’s Chihuahua jumps from a moving train; in one of the film’s best visual gags, Harold comes to the rescue and scoops the little dog up as the train rolls on. After returning the dog to Mary, due to the train’s no dog policy, what follows is series of antics in which he helps Mary cover up the dog’s presence. 

These involve Harold pretending to have a bad case of the barks, munching on a dog biscuit and hiding the dog under the long, grey beard of an old gentleman (Gus Leonard). It is through these gags that a deep bond develops between the two of the the characters.

Harold, in turn, is genuinely flattered when Mary discovers his manuscript of “The Secrets of Making Love” and asks to hear about it. The sequence ends with Mary enthralled by Harold rattling on about his book; both, however, are unaware that the train has reached its destination and the other passengers have exited the train.

Hiding the dog on the train (3:27).

This section of the film is significant because it is here that the first major shift in Lloyd’s character occurs, he goes from a timid tailor’s apprentice, who can barely look a pretty girl in the eye, to a resilient individual, who is willing to make himself the fool just to help a pretty girl. 

This is key to understanding the difference between a Harold Lloyd gag film, e.g. Safety Last, and a Harold Lloyd character film, e.g. Girl Shy, in the gag film the gags are supreme, but in a character film the gags are there to serve the characters.

However, aside from Lloyd, and to a lesser degree Ralston, there are not any other unique or wide ranging characterisations that stick out. If we are to follow the opening credits in which only four of the characters receive onscreen credit, then the most important characters in the film are Harold, Mary, Jerry Meadows and Ronald DeVore (Charlton Griffin). 

DeVore is the antagonist and fellow admirer of Mary; he is also a bigamist. Griffin is not inclined to do much acting because with his moustache, skeletal face and beady eyes, DeVore already looks very vile and incredibly shifty.

DeVore is playing a stereotype, but it is a reductive stereotype: reducing the bigamist’s personality to very little, as one intertitle says: “Ronald DeVore - the type of man that men forget.” 

As Lloyd already had an affinity for respecting woman, clearly, his attitude towards a bigamist is plain - in the film Harold throws a stone at DeVore’s head.

After a long night of writing- exhausted, just like Harold.



On the other hand, with Daniels’ character Jerry Meadows (Harold’s uncle in the film) there is a characterisation, but only in so far that if Girl Shy wasn’t already a comedy, Harold’s uncle would be the comic relief character. 

Indeed, all of the emotion and pathos is attached firmly to Lloyd’s and Ralston’s characters; but agreeably so, seeing as this is a romantic comedy about their interplay with one another.

Another significant character shift comes when Harold discovers that Mary is about to marry DeVore; it is also in this scene that Harold discovers that DeVore is a bigamist! Now Harold’s destiny is set: he must stop the wedding ceremony and save Mary! Thus the film itself also enacts a shift as the character element begins to fade out and the gag/spectacle element starts to fade in. 

Aside from a brief reprise in the closing minutes, from here on out the film is concerned with visual gags in what is considered: “the greatest race-to-the-rescue sequence of the entire silent cinema” (Vance et al., 2002:108). It even went on to influence the chariot race in Ben-Hur: A Tale of Christ (Dir. Fred Niblo, USA, 1925) the following year. 


Some of Lloyd's races to the rescue (3:47).

In many ways the sheer ambition and scale of what Lloyd does with Girl Shy’s race sequence tops what he did with the building climb in Safety Last, albeit horizontally.

The race sequence is filled with different forms of transportation: foot, cars, motorcycle, streetcar, horseback, horse and carriage. It needs to have different forms of transportation considering it clocks in at twenty minutes! 

However, the length of it does not, by any means, compromise the visceral impact of the sequence. Lloyd may not have been a through-and-through comedian, with a Vaudevillian or Music Hall background, but he was a genius when it came to exploiting physically distressing situations for comedy:

“Lloyd did it exceptionally well-perhaps too well; some people still reject him for making them feel uncomfortable” (Brownlow 2002:13). 

One line of criticism maintains that: “Lloyd tended to be dismissed as a mechanical comedian, too concerned with laughs for their own sake. Gilbert Seldes, chronicler of the popular arts, declared that Lloyd had no tenderness” (Brownlow 2002:10), while this Is certainly true of Lloyd’s early comedies, how someone can say there is no tenderness in a film like Girl Shy is madness! 


The silent beauty of Girl Shy (2:38).

Tenderness is an essential quality of the Harold Meadows character.

On the other hand, when talking about the race sequence this line of thought does hold some weight. In one sense, the spectator does not care about Mary, as inhuman as this sounds, because Lloyd’s brilliant physical performance and orchestration detracts all of the spectator’s attention from the eventual goal of the race: to prevent the wedding ceremony - to save Mary! 

This is something that Lloyd himself agreed with, as he: “believed the chase sequence – which he loved – overwhelmed everything that preceded it. (Vance et al., 2002:108). However, it would be unfair to accuse of all the race sequence as being like this and while most of it is an elaborate side track, the emphasis is placed back on Mary in the final minutes of the race, as evidenced with the increased amount of cuts back to her.

Mechanical comedies?


It has been commented that: “The Girl Shy chase was the heart of the entire picture” (Correll 1992). While this is true in illustrating Lloyd’s brilliance as a visual comedian and in the sense that: “Harold decided to make that film based on the chase” (Correll 1992), it is not in terms of how Lloyd and Ralston interplay with each other in the narrative, as Vance says: “The love story in Girl Shy was the start of Lloyd’s maturity as a filmmaker” (Vance et al., 2002:115). 

Ultimately, it is still a compliment to say that Girl Shy has two hearts: a character heart and a gag heart.

With his everyday quality and horn-rimmed glasses, It has long been held that Lloyd’s Glass Character was the inspiration for Superman’s alter ego Clark Kent. Certainly, this comparison explains Lloyd’s mass appeal as the Glass character and of a film like Girl Shy, because Lloyd plays an average looking person who achieves incredible things: “he draws on ordinary life and people could recognise themselves” (Brownlow 2007). 

Girl shy Harold and less shy Mary Buckingham.

Lloyd’s skill as a versatile actor allows his Superman quality to be infectious for his audience: “Lloyd’s own charm, his innate optimism, and his aggressive pursuit of success, elements so typical of the 1920’s, all combine to give his films a perennial freshness and zest” (Everson, 1978:276) and, with its two hearts pumping this freshness and zest, Girl Shy is a prime example of Lloyd’s infectiousness.



Bibliography

Brownlow, K. (1979) Hollywood: The Pioneers. London: William Collins Sons & Co LTD.

Everson, W.K. (1978) ‘Comedy’. In: American Silent Film. New York: Da Capo Press, Inc, pp.260-280.

Jacobs, S. (2010) ‘Slapstick Skyscrapers’. In: Paulus, T and King, R. eds. Slapstick Comedy. New York: Routledge, pp.152-168.

Merton, P. (2007) Silent Comedy. London: Random House Books.

Vance, J. and Lloyd, S. (2002) Harold Lloyd: Master Comedian. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Incorporated.



Filmography

“American Masters” Harold Lloyd: The Third Genius, 1992. [Online] Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjq41EFgsuM&feature=BFa&list=PL8314099849315292&lf=plpp_video

Ben-Hur: A Tale of Christ (1925) film: Dir. Fred Niblo. 143 minutes. USA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

Girl Shy (DVD); Fred C. Newmeyer and Sam Taylor. 87 minutes. USA: The Harold Lloyd Corporation, Pathé Exchange, 1924 (2007).

Memories, Secrets and Gags: Kevin Brownlow Interview. (2007) DVD. [9 Disc Harold Lloyd: The Definitive Collection]; 29 hours 06 minutes. Optimum Releasing Limited.

Safety Last! (1923) film; Dir. Fred C. Newmeyer and Sam Taylor. 70 minutes. USA: Hal Roach Studios, Pathé Exchange.

Retelling a Story: The Eager Student Redux


Sometimes the first way you tell a story isn’t always the best way; sometimes you have to go back and retell it a different way.

This post comes from a highly regarded dissertation length reflection piece I wrote for the Planning and Making a Film module I undertook in the penultimate year of my BA (Hons). The module's practice was undertaken between October 2011 to June 2012 and it provided me with a hugely enriching experience. For a more detailed overview of the module and the projects I undertook as a part of it, see Planning and Making a Film: The student filmmaking experience.


Technically, I feel that I have gained a great deal from the module. From being the cinematographer on Where will it all stop and the Lighting technician on One Door Opened I now understand much more about how light works and how the manipulation of light, both inside and outside the camera, can inform the story you are trying to tell. In terms of organisation and group work I have gained a great deal of experience and learned some valuable lessons here as well.

Editing is something that I am stronger with now and together with the theoretical skills editing One Door Opened has provided me with I feel that I am better suited to assemble a succinct and engaging story. To illustrate this I have gone back and re-edited my group’s version of The Eager Student. Now with a slightly altered premise - a student has gone to her seminar, discovers it has been cancelled and then leaves - I have re-assembled it into something that tells the story in a form that, I believe, is much more engaging.


The Eager Student Redux

I think this process of re-jigging a story sums up the module and filmmaking as a whole. What I have learned from the making of One Door Opened and by analysing the adaptation of Busybody is a story can improve and be told more effectively the more it is worked over. 

One Door Opened was originally told in a script that we deemed to be slightly bloated, so we cut out quite a bit and preserved what we thought was the story. Then in the editing suite we cut it together as the shooting script dictated and realised that there was even more material we could get rid of. Once we had done that other people looked at it and suggested some lines of dialogue be removed here and shots be changed there. Even after submitting the final cut, I now look at One Door Opened and think it can refined further. 

Therefore, a narrative film can be vastly improved the more it is recycled through the various stages of its creation. The Filmmaker’s Handbook explains this process perfectly when it quotes Robert Bresson:

“My movie is first born in my head, dies on paper; is resuscitated by the living persons and real objects I use, which are killed on film but, placed in a certain order and projected onto a screen, come to life again like flowers in water.”

Sometimes the first way you tell a story isn’t always the best way; sometimes you have to go back and retell it a different way. This understanding of how the filmmaking process evolves a story is something which builds greatly on the knowledge I have already gained from the other parts of my degree, Creative Writing with Film and Screen Studies; as well as my previous filmmaking experiences. Therefore, I believe that the module has contributed greatly to my skills as a storyteller, both in script form and in visual form. 

Skills that I plan to put to good use!

And I did, want to find out how?

Fencing: an examination of the sport and an exploration of the documentary medium

Or head back to Planning and Making a Film: The student filmmaking experience and have a look through some of the other material I generated from my experiences in this module.

The Final Cut: One Door Opened


let’s muddle everything up, let’s play around with continuity, let’s put some jump cuts in, let’s overlap things, let’s distort the image, let’s make the noise of the cars outside so loud that it deafens the audience and makes the front door look truly indomitable, let’s just give the film a disjointed feel like it is confused and scared – let’s make the film become Amelia and her anxiety.

This post comes from a highly regarded dissertation length reflection piece I wrote for the Planning and Making a Film module I undertook in the penultimate year of my BA (Hons). The module's practice was undertaken between October 2011 to June 2012 and it provided me with a hugely enriching experience. For a more detailed overview of the module and the projects I undertook as a part of it, see Planning and Making a Film: The student filmmaking experience.

Here I present my final thoughts on the final cut of One Door Opened and, crucially some suggestions on how we could have vastly improved this "final" cut. Truthfully, I do not consider this the final cut of the film, it is not good enough to be a final cut, this is merely the module submission cut...



I think we definitely picked the right actress for Amelia; Helena does a remarkable job in conveying Amelia’s anxiety.



Richard, equally, does the job at playing the concerned and reasoning delivery man.



I think some of the shots we have are effective at representing Amelia’s smallness in comparison to house’s overbearing presence and, at times, even make her look trapped.



However, now that I have finally stepped away from editing and had a break, I still think the film is too long! As I said with sound, not enough effect is made of it and, therefore, the film plays much slower than it could and should do. I think something taking too long to happen in film and not being very interesting can cause the spectator to lose interest, as was the case with my group’s version of The Eager Student. This risks happening at certain points in One Door Opened, such as in the shot where Amelia retreats back from the door and takes her coat off – it seems to go on forever!


As I said in the editing section of this post, the last 6 minutes of the Workprint contained the main struggle of the film and were preserved accordingly. However, since writing this blog post and analysing Busybody in comparison to my own script, my thinking is now - to hell with that! As I said with sound, I feel we need to intensify Amelia’s anxiety in the structure of the film itself. 

Therefore, let’s muddle everything up, let’s play around with continuity, let’s put some jump cuts in, let’s overlap things, let’s distort the image, let’s make the noise of the cars outside so loud that it deafens the audience and makes the front door look truly indomitable, let’s just give the film a disjointed feel like it is confused and scared – let’s make the film become Amelia and her anxiety.

Aside from editing, though, I think we should have put more thought into the visual design of the film before production. One of the problems is the camera is always still. If we had used more camera movement; moving the camera in what is otherwise a still environment could have done wonders to visually represent Amelia’s unease. 

In Martin Scorsese’s 1995 gangster film Casino there is a wonderful shot where Ace (Robert De Nero) is waiting to get on the phone to talk with Nicky (Joe Pesci) to decide on a place to meet.


In the voiceover, Ace explains that Federal Agents are listening in but if it’s a domestic call, e.g. Ace’s wife talking to Nicky’s wife, then the Feds have to stop listening after the first couple of minutes. As soon as Ace hears the Feds click off he grabs the phone and as he does this the camera zooms in and slants to the side.


What started off as a very calm, static shot has suddenly taken on a whole new frantic energy as Ace and Nicky have to quickly decide on a meeting point before the Feds start listening again. Now, I’m not saying we should have used this shot in one of the phone conversations in One Door Opened, but I am trying to illustrate the change of mood that can made by simply moving the camera. 

Also, the phone conversation with Richard (1:00 - 1:47) and the second phone conversation with the mother (2:48 - 3:25) visually look exactly the same and, personally, I think we should have either altered the camera positions or changed the location of one the phone conversations. 

From having edited it for two months, I know the film inside out, but I still have a hard time remembering that there are two different phone conversations that happen in the living room. The reason why this happened is because my mind blends the two very similar visuals together.


I think, If you’ve got an 8 minute film of which about 5 minutes takes place in the same corridor the need to visually mix up the rest of the film becomes obvious!

Overall, for something that tells the story of someone who is afraid to leave her house and then manages to, the film does basically achieve that. However, for something that conveys just how scared the main protagonist feels going through that scenario, the film leaves a lot to answer for!

With the adaptation of Busybody I said that more suspense and jeopardy needed to be injected but what’s great about Busybody is it still works without that. On the other hand, One Door Opened is a film that absolutely needs to exploit suspense and jeopardy to be truly believable in the story it is trying to tell. 

If we really presented just how hard it is for Amelia to leave the house it would be all the more powerful when she does actually manage to do that. The film would then have a truly satisfying conclusion.


However, once again, I’ve probably been slightly negative [critical - it's a good thing] here (If my group is reading this, I did warn you). I think what we have produced is still worthy of recognition in its demonstration of the theoretical and technical skills that we have acquired and refined from the beginning of the academic year. 

While I feel there is more that can be done with our edit, I am still pleased with the time and effort that has been put into it. While I do feel the effect could be intensified, I still think that our adaptation of One Door Opened tells the story we set out to tell.

Next: Retelling a Story: The Eager Student Redux - this is where I wrap the module up and bring my experience within it to a conclusion.